Re:Uber vehicle reportedly saw but ignored woman it struck
by flyingfences on Monday May 07, 2018 @04:35PM
(#17016274)
A car that defaults to braking without any deduction beyond detection will never make it through an intersection, let alone a whole trip, in some parts of the world.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Uber vehicle reportedly saw but ignored woman it struck
by isostatic on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @02:50AM
(#17019302)
New York looks like a well regulated army training course compared with somewhere like Cairo.
Never is a long time, but I don't see self driving cars coping well when traffic is coming the wrong way down the street, let alone when cars are driving along the sidewalk
Re:Uber vehicle reportedly saw but ignored woman it struck
by Symmetry on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @08:24AM
(#17020417)
Yes, Cairo will probably have self-driving cars over a decade after New York has them. But that doesn't mean self-driving cards aren't a commercially viable product before they work in Cairo. Very few technological innovations work better than the thing they replace in all circumstances initially. Back In The Day there were a lot of places a horse could go that a Model T couldn't but that didn't prevent cars from replacing horses.