Perhaps you could substantiate your statement a little more. The OP has written 750 words arguing the opposite. You write 6 words making no argument and somehow think that's a valuable contribution to the discussion?

Maybe he had something really valuable to add but passed out thinking about it and his head hit the reply button?

Sometimes less is ok.

I don't really see the OP as having argued anything as he states that he might well be incorrect. In such a case a 6 word response can be as equally valid as 750 words of unqualified blog filler.

Ouch. I'm not sure how admitting that my knowledge of the subject in question might be less than perfect constitutes "not having argued anything".