News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Subscription Hell by chrisseaton on Sunday May 06, 2018 @04:15PM (#17008258)
> consumers price goods by value, not by costs

But the point is he's a consumer and he isn't pricing by value - he's pricing by costs.

Re:Subscription Hell by notSupplied on Sunday May 06, 2018 @11:20PM (#17010181)
"consumers price goods by value, not by costs"

That is in itself a great argument for the subscription model. Consumes receive value from continued use over time, so why not fit revenue to the same shape?

Re:Subscription Hell by gerbilly on Sunday May 06, 2018 @08:52PM (#17009644)
I disagree, I saw it as him pricing by value, but mentioning that the costs don't seem to make sense either.