Re:NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp ris...
by visarga on Saturday May 05, 2018 @12:46PM
(#17002551)
Government represents the interests of capital, not of ordinary people.
Re:NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp ris...
by haZard_OS on Sunday May 06, 2018 @12:12AM
(#17005186)
I'm interested in the concept but do you have a suggestion for a book published more recently? "Do Elections Matter?" was published almost 30 years ago.
Re:NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp ris...
by tsbertalan on Sunday May 06, 2018 @12:25PM
(#17006955)
Well, there's [1], but see also references in this Vox article, which hedges that somewhat: [2]
[1] https://www.vox.com/2016/5/9/11502464/gilens-page-oligarchy-... [2] https://scholar.princeton.edu/sites/default/files/mgilens/fi...
Re:NSA collected 500M U.S. call records in 2017, a sharp ris...
by fulafel on Saturday May 05, 2018 @01:21PM
(#17002712)
It's not exactly the same idea. But of course I would be interested in hearing if the referenced book could explain away my observations of government/popular opinion alignment in the issues discussed. Random chance is of course one possibility.
The policy preferences of the voting constituency in any given national election are not strongly correlated to policy results. This is shown convincingly in Benjamin Ginsberg's book, "Do Elections Matter?" I strongly recommend this book - after reading it, you will never again try to explain away an act of government by attributing it to voter sentiment.
It is a difficult-to-deny fact that, in the USA, the government frequently and quietly advances policies which do not appear to be derived from any kind electoral mandate, nor are favored by a substantial portion of the electorate.