News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Twitter urges users to change passwords after computer 'g... by adrianmonk on Thursday May 03, 2018 @06:53PM (#16990755)
> consider that no one logs this stuff accidentally to begin with

It's possible. You create an object called Foo (possibly a serialized data like a protobuf, but any object), and you recursively dump the whole thing to the debug log. Then you realize, oh, when I access a Foo, sometimes I need this one field out of the User object (like their first name), so I'll just add a copy of User within Foo. You don't consider that the User object also contains the password as one of its members. Boom, you are now accidentally logging passwords.

Re:Twitter urges users to change passwords after computer 'g... by johnsonjo on Thursday May 03, 2018 @07:56PM (#16991048)
Any user object on the server should only ever have the password when it is going through the process of setting or checking the password, and this should be coming from the client and not stored. So, your case of logging the user would only be bad at one of those times. Otherwise like in the case of a stored user you should just have a hashed password and a salt in the user object.
Re:Twitter urges users to change passwords after computer 'g... by krapp on Thursday May 03, 2018 @09:01PM (#16991388)
Ok.

Creating a User object that holds a password (much less a password in plaintext) seems next level stupid to begin with, but fair enough, I guess it could happen.