Re:The 8000th Busy Beaver number eludes ZF set theory (2016)
by mannykannot on Thursday May 03, 2018 @05:39PM
(#16990222)
It might not be what Dennett meant, but I don't think issues of informational distance refute the claim that we can expect selection for reproductive fitness to be a feature in any random process that gives rise to replicators. After the appearance of the replicator, the random process continues to operate under the same rules (laws of physics) as before.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:The 8000th Busy Beaver number eludes ZF set theory (2016)
by a1369209993 on Friday May 04, 2018 @08:15PM
(#16999462)
After the appearance (and sufficent success) of the replicator, it stops being a random process. Edit: or at least not a completely/primarily random process.