Re:Stephen Hawking's Final Paper Cuts the Multiverse Down to...
by kazinator on Thursday May 03, 2018 @02:20PM
(#16988370)
Once you postulate a substrate, you then have to wrap your head around what is its substrate, and what is that substrate's substrate and so on. When you look at it that way, the no-substrate version looks better.
I get it, but I can't quite wrap my head around a mathematical universe with no substrate. As though any internally consistent ontology with self-aware structures (and, it seems to me, also those without) just "exists" apropos of nothing. What's doing the math?