News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Proton Native – React Native for the desktop by mlsarecmg on Thursday May 03, 2018 @08:22AM (#16985285)
And that is what i suspected and what i've seen in all examples i have browsed through so far. The enabled prop wasn't the point, it demonstrates functional composition. All of the above uses old, traditional layout inflating, dependency injection, imperative registration for re-using components, ...and common MVC. They are hard for applications that get even slightly complex.

There is a major difference between that and Reacts approach.

Re:Proton Native – React Native for the desktop by dahauns on Thursday May 03, 2018 @09:03AM (#16985562)
Sorry to go full "get off my lawn" here, but: How is this different from, say, simple GDI rendering or Swing? With both View is a function of state and rendering is done via idempotent function calls (WM_PAINT bzw. paint()/paintComponent()). This is the real traditional method. (BTW: The comparison to MVC doesn't really make sense, unless you add flux/redux/etc. to the equation.)
Re:Proton Native – React Native for the desktop by abritinthebay on Thursday May 03, 2018 @11:11AM (#16986720)
He means the V in MVC and while they pushed that concept for React at the beginning to help people get what it’s for... it’s not really the same at all.
Re:Proton Native – React Native for the desktop by jcelerier on Thursday May 03, 2018 @11:25AM (#16986831)
.... where do you see imperative registration, layout inflating and MVC in my example ?
Re:Proton Native – React Native for the desktop by mlsarecmg on Thursday May 03, 2018 @12:31PM (#16987424)
It just doesn't look comparable to the example i've posted. They were really, really simple, so if QT is the same, i would love to see it do the same. As for imperative registration, didn't you just link me to it? If they were functions, you could do:

    const A = () => <div>...</div>
    const B = () => <h1><A /></h1>
Notice that the B component can refer to the A component because it's in the same scope. There's no magic and no binding/loading. A is a function that is called inside B's function body. It also isn't done by inference of an ID (which would be registration).
Re:Proton Native – React Native for the desktop by jcelerier on Thursday May 03, 2018 @01:02PM (#16987679)
> const A = () => <div>...</div> ; const B = () => <h1><A /></h1>

Yes, an equivalent in QML would look like this if you want it in a single file:

    Component {
        id: a
        Text { text: "foo" }
    }

    Component {
        id: b
        Rectangle { Loader { sourceComponent: a } }
    }
but the language really wants you to have one component per file, so :

   A.qml: 
   
   Text { text: "foo" }

   B.qml

   Rectangle { A { } }
> if QT is the same,

It's not. QML is at its core not a functional language, it's a declarative & reactive language. In my experience, at least 30-40% of QML code does not need any functions.

> There's no magic and no binding/loading.

I'm not sure we are using the same meaning of binding. The "A" token in your example is obviously bound to the "A" variable declared before.

> It also isn't done by inference of an ID (which would be registration).

ids in QML are just the variable names. eg

   Rectangle { 
     A { id: foo } 
     width: 2 * foo.width
   }