Re:Python startup time: milliseconds matter
by dingo_bat on Wednesday May 02, 2018 @09:24PM
(#16982627)
That is probably the only reason to use rust over go or cpp.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Python startup time: milliseconds matter
by catamorphismic on Thursday May 03, 2018 @04:53AM
(#16984362)
Really? The only reason?
Re:Python startup time: milliseconds matter
by dingo_bat on Thursday May 03, 2018 @07:22AM
(#16984943)
Only one I can see. Want speed and performance and safety? C++. Want easy multithreading? Go. Rust's only claim to fame is that Mozilla is dogfooding it.
> Want speed and performance and safety? C++.
Speed and performance sure, but safety automatically rules out C++.
> Want easy multithreading? Go
Want speed, performance, safety, and easy multithreading? Rust.
Re:Python startup time: milliseconds matter
by dingo_bat on Thursday May 03, 2018 @11:27AM
(#16986844)
C++ still does multi-threading better than rust, just that go does it better. Similarly go does perf better than rust, just that cpp is even better. So yeah, if you want the worst of all worlds coupled with the pains associated with a brand new language (try compiling rust for a armv5 soc) rust all the way!
Re:Python startup time: milliseconds matter
by greenhouse_gas on Thursday May 03, 2018 @12:40PM
(#16987509)
Can you show a benchmark where Go outperforms Rust?