News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by ryanlol on Tuesday May 01, 2018 @01:29PM (#16969201)
>I'm not entirely certain GDPR covers phone calls.

Depends on the content and the information stored alongside it, the medium is irrelevant.

Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by tjoff on Wednesday May 02, 2018 @04:37AM (#16975069)
Shouldn't the voice be personal identifiable information? Just as a picture is.

They could of course store a machine translated transcript instead (assuming no personally identifiable information is uttered (though almost always there is, the customer is expected to give a customer ID or something)).

Also, considering how bad computers are at understanding spoken words the usefulness would be debatable depending on context.

Re:Customer takes Bell to court and wins by TallGuyShort on Wednesday May 02, 2018 @09:44AM (#16976765)
I would imagine most calls that people would want to record would contain PII anyway: account numbers, etc.