Re:Twitter also sold data access to Cambridge Analytica rese...
by petertodd on Monday April 30, 2018 @02:22PM
(#16960946)
> Facebook clearly is a public forum.
Facebook is not clearly a public forum. My close friends do not constitute the public, yet CA got access to data that only those close friends would have otherwise seen.
Re:Twitter also sold data access to Cambridge Analytica rese...
by jononor on Monday April 30, 2018 @03:32PM
(#16961508)
Many aspects of Facebook with different expectations of private/publicness. Examples: comment form on public website powered by FB, FB page for å product, public FB group, private FB group, FB direct messages, FB group messages, personal FB wall/feed.
In light of these, categorical statements about all of Facebook is not very meaningful.
Facebook clearly is a public forum. It clearly has shared private data with CA. Both of these issues deserve to be discussed, and both will have different, possibly even conflicting outcomes.
And really, that same thing could be true for, say, cable companies as well - they provide a public service, and they are regulated by a local franchising authority. We don't currently see content regulation, but if your local cable provider started, say, providing a channel dedicated to cannibalism, you might see changes in that. At the same time, the subscriber lists are considered private, and sale of them is regulated.
The main reason you don't see much of a mix here is that pre-Internet communication is mostly of the broadcasting type, which has only very few areas where private data actually exists.