Re:IBM is not doing "cognitive computing" with Watson (2016)
by simion314 on Monday April 30, 2018 @12:58PM
(#16960239)
The numbers are wrong since it compares expensive new cars versus everything else(old cars with no safety features, bikes, buses) if you compare with similar cars you get numbers that are not in Tesla favor.
So try not to spread this false numbers, also the Tesla numbers are not open to be examined by third parties.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:IBM is not doing "cognitive computing" with Watson (2016)
by gnicholas on Monday April 30, 2018 @01:53PM
(#16960722)
Yep, as shown by the stats in the latter half of this article: https://www.thedailybeast.com/how-tesla-and-elon-musk-exagge...
Disclosure: I am one of the co-authors
Re:IBM is not doing "cognitive computing" with Watson (2016)
by x43b on Monday April 30, 2018 @02:37PM
(#16961078)
Why is applied physicist in quotes? Elon has a ivy league physics degree, was accepted at Stanford in applied physics, and has clearly applied a knowledge of physics at numerous companies.
Re:IBM is not doing "cognitive computing" with Watson (2016)
by frgtpsswrdlame on Monday April 30, 2018 @01:02PM
(#16960265)
Not to mention that
every 320 million miles in vehicles equipped with Autopilot hardware.
does not mean 320 million miles with autopilot controlling the vehicle. Who knows how many of those miles are human driven?