News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by a_bonobo on Sunday April 29, 2018 @10:28PM (#16955244)
>food safety rating, which you can work on and improve

But the GDPR works like this too? The $20 million fine is not automatically applied. Here's a flow chart which details the process of a GDPR breach: https://40uu5c99f3a2ja7s7miveqgqu-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp...

from https://www.i-scoop.eu/gdpr/gdpr-fines-guidelines-applicatio...

If you breach the rules, a simple reprimand without a fine is possible too.

Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by tripletao on Sunday April 29, 2018 @10:51PM (#16955332)
Is the 20M EUR maximum reduced by law, or just by regulatory discretion? The USA is currently demonstrating (with DACA, marijuana enforcement, etc.) the fragility of the latter.
Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by detaro on Monday April 30, 2018 @05:57AM (#16957206)
The law explicitly lists factors the regulators have to take into account for determining the fine. If they give a large fine for a small infringement, they're going to have a hard time to claim they took all factors in your favor in account properly.
Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by a_bonobo on Sunday April 29, 2018 @11:57PM (#16955618)
From what I've seen, it's partially like in the US - each EU member has its own data protection authority which imposes those fines, but they are closer linked than the US states' laws. I can definitely see some EU countries slacking off on enforcing, or being less/more harsh than the others.
Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by briandear on Monday April 30, 2018 @12:29AM (#16955746)
But 20 million is possible right? Even for a small offence? Where in the actual text of the law does it say that they will never impose the maximum fine for a trivial or minor offence?

It actually doesn’t say that. This law has the effect of small business essentially needing a 20 million insurance policy to protect against the possible whims of an overzealous regulator? It’s either insure yourself for 20 million or risk losing your entire business over potentially a trivial matter.

When people in the UK have been jailed 8 months over traffic cameras or prosecuted and jailed for speech, I wouldn’t give a European government the benefit of any doubt. Willingly inviting an unelected regulator, accountable to nothing but the letter of a badly written law created by another unelected government body — that’s just foolish.

Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by hectormalot on Monday April 30, 2018 @01:12AM (#16955945)
It’s probably not possible. I wouldn’t map the (EU) GDPR on how a US-like legal system works. E.g. it’s very unlikely that the regulator seeks maximum penalties in the EU, and worst case you could go to court arguing that a penalty is non proportional compared to other cases (and win)

The maximum fine is a cap, not a guideline.

Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by mdpopescu on Monday April 30, 2018 @03:15AM (#16956452)
> It’s probably not possible.

That's one of the funniest statements I've read today. Or annoying, I'm not sure. Definitely meaningless.

Re:StreetLend.com shuts down, citing GDPR regulations by xearl on Monday April 30, 2018 @02:41AM (#16956311)
> Where in the actual text of the law does it say that they will never impose the maximum fine for a trivial or minor offence?

Article 83 (including related recitals)