Re:NASA Mars Mission Faces Setback After Heat Shield Cracks ...
by jotm on Saturday April 28, 2018 @07:00AM
(#16947086)
That doesn't make sense for the size of the current crafts. You'd just end up with a lot of heat on all sides of it instead of only the front, imo
Re:NASA Mars Mission Faces Setback After Heat Shield Cracks ...
by DoctorOetker on Saturday April 28, 2018 @07:27AM
(#16947153)
right the temperature on the back side would be higher than on current craft, but the backside would be able to radiate heat no?
alternative idea:
the solid aborbs heat (cools the shield) to melt, then absorbs heat to warm up and boil, and the boiling gas is used as retro-firing rockets, any decrease in momentum due to the retro-rockets is less future heat absorbed (since the craft is slowing down faster)
think controlled steam explosion
if the temperature difference between hot and cold side is too large one might need multiple heat pipes in series each operating at their own temperature. The hot side heat pipe might only act as a heat pipe as it nears its operating temperature, i.e. it might be solid during travel, then melt during the first phase of entry, and only reach both vapour and liquid phase -thus enabling it to work as a heat pipe- during the hottest part of re-entry