News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by gowld on Friday April 27, 2018 @04:15PM (#16943924)
"Retraction" in publishing usually doesn't mean "removing from view. Also, Google's dictionary doesn't mention "view".

https://www.google.com/search?q=define+retraction

1. the action of drawing something back or back in. "prey are grasped between the jaws upon tongue retraction"

2. a withdrawal of a statement, accusation, or undertaking. "he issued a retraction of his allegations"

In traditioal practice, it means "Adding a Retraction tag". In CS terms, it's a soft-delete.

For a very famous example:

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6...

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by burntwater on Friday April 27, 2018 @06:58PM (#16945083)
The traditional practice you're referring to, in traditional publishing, has been around for centuries. It was very difficult/impossible to physically retract a printed article. But had that ability been there (and it probably has in limited cases) it's not hard to believe that given the option physical retraction would have been the preferred option. The Internet now allows us to go the preferred route.