News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:NASA Mars Mission Faces Setback After Heat Shield Cracks ... by toss1 on Friday April 27, 2018 @03:17PM (#16943507)
...Aaand, that's why we run the tests!

Better to fix it in a component/unit test than to lose the entire project

A successful test, identifying an flawed component design.

Re:NASA Mars Mission Faces Setback After Heat Shield Cracks ... by mattnewport on Friday April 27, 2018 @04:35PM (#16944071)
It's also worth pointing out that if your tests don't fail occasionally you may be over-engineering or being too cautious in your design and planning.
Re:NASA Mars Mission Faces Setback After Heat Shield Cracks ... by Sharlin on Friday April 27, 2018 @04:40PM (#16944103)
...or your test coverage is insufficient.
Re:NASA Mars Mission Faces Setback After Heat Shield Cracks ... by imglorp on Friday April 27, 2018 @05:30PM (#16944515)
Also, a learning opportunity. If it had just worked, we would know less. Sometimes you have to blow up a few things to make progress--ask Elon.
Re:NASA Mars Mission Faces Setback After Heat Shield Cracks ... by mejari on Friday April 27, 2018 @04:23PM (#16943980)
>A successful test, identifying an flawed component design.

It could also be a flawed component. Just because the test failed doesn't mean the design is flawed.

Re:NASA Mars Mission Faces Setback After Heat Shield Cracks ... by toss1 on Friday April 27, 2018 @04:40PM (#16944105)
true, thx (definitely a flawed writing component there)
Re:NASA Mars Mission Faces Setback After Heat Shield Cracks ... by TomK32 on Friday April 27, 2018 @04:29PM (#16944029)
Every inch of this is true, good tests are our success meter. /s