NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A Lie From Google'

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by sqdbps on Friday April 27, 2018 @03:08PM (#16943410)

What's with all the "teeth" comments lately? who's pushing that agenda?

We enjoy great constitutional protection to publish, unless it's copyright violation or you're revealing the allied plan for the normandy invasion no court will rule against you.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by aidenn0 on Friday April 27, 2018 @03:31PM (#16943610)

There typically aren't criminal charges, but civil penalties for publishing private information do abound. Whether or not that constitutes censorship is a matter of semantics.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by sqdbps on Friday April 27, 2018 @03:42PM (#16943698)

A newspaper? fined for publishing? no such animal.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by grigjd3 on Friday April 27, 2018 @05:03PM (#16944311)

You must be unaware of what happens when photos of minors are published without parental consent.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by danso on Friday April 27, 2018 @06:54PM (#16945059)

What happens, exactly? In the U.S., AFAIK, there is no law preventing taking and publishing photos in the newspaper of minors or others in public spaces without prior consent.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by grigjd3 on Tuesday May 08, 2018 @07:53PM (#17026376)

You can Google it, but school districts across the country have created bans on publishing pictures of students and those bans are enforceable by law.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by aidenn0 on Monday April 30, 2018 @12:36AM (#16955764)

Gawker?

[ Parent | on HN ]