NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A Lie From Google'

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by djrogers on Friday April 27, 2018 @02:36PM (#16943127)

Removing stories completely is akin to hiding the fact taht you failed in your journalistic responsibilities. It would be better for the integrity of the journalist if the story remained available with the details of the failure plastered above/below etc.

Don't erase your mistakes - own up to them.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by emodendroket on Friday April 27, 2018 @03:08PM (#16943401)

If your story unfairly libels someone, particularly a private individual, that presents its own ethical challenges, doesn't it?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by mcherm on Friday April 27, 2018 @04:00PM (#16943824)

Not at all. One could do as NPR has done in this case: Remove the original story and replace it with a statement of why it has been retracted. Nothing is hidden, and the incorrect story is removed.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by emodendroket on Saturday April 28, 2018 @10:25AM (#16947768)

I guess my concern is someone looking you up and the results being dominated by results like "Joe Smith, 55, of 22 East Wessex St, caught stealing from orphans" being a problem, even if clicking through shows a correction rather than the original story.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:NPR Retracts Story 'The Man Who Spent $100K To Remove A L... by snupples on Saturday April 28, 2018 @01:53PM (#16948747)

It is owning up to the mistake - hence the published retraction.

[ Parent | on HN ]