News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Intel's 10nm Is Broken, Delayed Until 2019 by Const-me on Friday April 27, 2018 @06:00AM (#16939599)
One reason is cost. Large size means there’re fewer chips produced per wafer, which means every single chip will cost more, proportionally to the area of a single chip.

Another reason is yield. Defects are inevitable. Their probability per unit of area is roughly constant, i.e. it doesn’t depend on the area of a single chip. Therefore, the probability of one or more defects on a single chip is proportional to the exponent of the chip area. With larger chips, that exponent grows very quickly.

Re:Intel's 10nm Is Broken, Delayed Until 2019 by heavenlyblue on Friday April 27, 2018 @06:15AM (#16939640)
You can always separate the chip into smaller cores and disable the ones that don't work.
Re:Intel's 10nm Is Broken, Delayed Until 2019 by Const-me on Friday April 27, 2018 @06:32AM (#16939693)
The tactics works well for GPUs. But for CPUs, you only can do that sometimes, not always.

Cores only make about half of the area. If the error is not in a core but in e.g. RAM controller or IO controller, you have to throw away the complete chip.