Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test (2016)
by vaxin on Thursday April 26, 2018 @12:46PM
(#16933494)
You forgot one more thing, google is loosing enginers due to it creepy nature. I was invited to interviews on multiple occasions but they are one of the last companies I would work for. I don't care about money, wherever I was working, I had it more than enough to have a really good life and a thousand $ up or down doesnt make much of a difference. But working for a company that actually engages into global spying of people is like a mental prostitution. Not I only wouldn't work for them but also wouldn't take anyone working for them in past working for me. I value people opinion about their impact to the world and google guys went way off into wrong direction. They are simply emitting the signal "I would do anything for money" and this attitude can be understood for someone working in McDonalds, but for a hi-tech worker that can get job anywhere, this is just unacceptable. It shows moral rottening (or just beeing "simpleminded") and... well sorry, there is more than enough other people I will be far more happy to work with. I am really sorry that people like Rob Pike and Ken Thompson, which I highly respect, work for them. As developers (Not Google, not Facebook, not Apple, not Microsoft! The Developers! Without them, they aren't worth a dime!) we are at the moment rulling the world, we have to accept some moral obligations instead of just beeing slaves to making money for others stock options.
(How cool, I get multiple downvotes which means that the average non-important people (I could use stronger words, but you do know where you fit) don't agree, which makes me flattered. Thank you.)
(The other guys upvoting me, thank you, you are somehow restoring my faith, that not everyone is a zealot)
Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test (2016)
by mancerayder on Thursday April 26, 2018 @01:16PM
(#16933740)
I can understand this sentiment.
To me, it feels like the Facebooks and Googles of the industry (by which I encompass other ad tech firms) are the 'banks' of 10 years ago. A few years ago, and I bet still today, there were/are a lot of new grads and experienced techies saying openly that they'd not want to work for a bank. Hopefully a similar spurning happens here.
Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test (2016)
by user5994461 on Thursday April 26, 2018 @02:35PM
(#16934368)
Which is very ironic considering banks were the biggest tech employers at that time and some had pretty good money and working conditions as well.
Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test (2016)
by jacobush on Friday April 27, 2018 @03:13AM
(#16938989)
How is that ironic...
Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test (2016)
by geofft on Thursday April 26, 2018 @01:25PM
(#16933812)
Yeah, I lumped that under "engineering culture," but AMP in particular and the nonchalance about centralizing everything on Google servers—and the fact that I knew AMP's PM would be rewarded for the project's success and not questioned on long-term good of the world in his promo meeting—was a concrete reason I wasn't excited about the job. I didn't want to be subject to the same incentives.
Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test (2016)
by drama_mean on Thursday April 26, 2018 @05:24PM
(#16935959)
You a G! My sentiments exactly. We are at a critical point in our world where we are the "magicians" and just chasing a paycheck isn't good enough. Interesting work isn't good enough. Making a positive impact on the world is the bare minimum....
Re:Google's “Director of Engineering” Hiring Test (2016)
by magic_beans on Thursday April 26, 2018 @01:58PM
(#16934064)
"google is loosing enginers due to it creepy nature"
Have a source for that?
If Google is losing out on good candidates, it's going to be either because of false negatives in the interview process, or ongoing engineering culture concerns (which is roughly why I declined the Google offer I got last year), not because of people self-selecting against annoying interviewing processes. Even this blog post itself is written in the form of "Here's what you need to know to get past the process" - i.e., even this guy assumes people still want to work at Google and work around their process.