Somehow I think that at 3 year anniversary of ICE people had some actual real world use cases for ICE where ICE was still somehow better than steam engine and animals, even if ICE itself was objectively terrible?
Re:Ethereum Sharding FAQ
by tuesdayrain on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @07:10PM
(#16927249)
Ethereum is objectively better in some cases. What if I want to gamble somewhere, but I don't trust websites to be honest about their odds? With Ethereum I could check the source code of the contract and be confident that it's legitimate.
Re:Ethereum Sharding FAQ
by ecocentrik on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @08:36PM
(#16927816)
Not only can you verify the code, you can verify that the code and the output wasn't modified during execution by some external actor.
Re:Ethereum Sharding FAQ
by blattimwind on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @07:10PM
(#16927253)
A 1910s ICE might have been terrible compared to a modern computer-driven engine built on one or the other dozen million man-hours, but back in the day it was still a very useful thing that powered machines and vehicles and even had broad military applications.
Ethereum is three years old. ICE is 200+.