News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:A censorship resistant deadman's switch by ofcourseianal on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @11:54AM (#16922740)
Censorship resistant, until someone takes down the “publisher tool meant to run autonomously on a trusted system”.
Re:A censorship resistant deadman's switch by w-m on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @12:21PM (#16923081)
And a landing page that omits this fact (but contains download and instructions for a command line tool). If you're thinking "wait, I can't put a self-publishing secret on the Ethereum blockchain, how does this even work?", the landing page leaves you hanging.
Re:A censorship resistant deadman's switch by rojoroboto on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @06:12PM (#16926772)
This is true.

I'm working with a friend who is a copy writer to help make the landing page clearer and more helpful.

Re:A censorship resistant deadman's switch by decentralised on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @12:42PM (#16923341)
Even if the web front end is taken down, the contract is still on-chain so it can be accessed via a web3 browser, a client or even in etherscan in the "read contract" tab.
Re:A censorship resistant deadman's switch by rtkwe on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @01:59PM (#16924227)
That just lets you see the contract. The decryption keys by necessity can't be located on the Etherium chain at all and have to be held by a trusted 3rd party/system that watches the contract and releases the keys when the checkin doesn't happen. If the attacker is able to locate and disable that system then the killcord is essentially diffused the owner would have to manually publish or have setup backups.
Re:A censorship resistant deadman's switch by rojoroboto on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @06:14PM (#16926784)
Right. The decryption keys aren't on the blockchain until they are "published". If all publishers are compromised or shut off before that happens, the killcord project has been terminated.
Re:A censorship resistant deadman's switch by rtkwe on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @11:31PM (#16928582)
Yeah, though finding them should be fairly hard because all they will look like from a network traffic perspective should be a normal-ish etherium non mining node and no direct communication between owner and publisher should exist after initial setup. Anyone planning on using this for serious matters should make sure that their trusted publishers are hosted anonymously (as far as is possible) or so spread out jurisdictionally to make attacking them all impractical.
Re:A censorship resistant deadman's switch by snissn on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @12:21PM (#16923074)
Water resistant vs water proof
Re:A censorship resistant deadman's switch by rojoroboto on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @05:55PM (#16926604)
This is a valid concern and why I'd encourage running multiple instance (geographically distributed) of the publisher.