Re:E-waste recycler loses appeal on computer restore disks, ...
by jonathankoren on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @12:12PM
(#16922965)
I’m really confused on what a “counterfeit operating system” would be. The only thing I can think of is some Linux distro made to look like Windows.
Re:E-waste recycler loses appeal on computer restore disks, ...
by risotto_groupon on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @12:27PM
(#16923153)
the [28,000] disks had "labels nearly identical to the discs provided by Dell for its computers and had the Windows and Dell logos," the Times wrote. As a result, Lundgren pleaded guilty to two of 21 charges, conspiracy and copyright infringement. He told the paper, "If I had just written 'Eric's Restore Disc' on there, it would have been fine."
Re:E-waste recycler loses appeal on computer restore disks, ...
by monocasa on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @12:45PM
(#16923373)
But, to be fair, they are byte for byte the same. It'd be one thing to use the trademarks on something that wasn't originally Microsoft's (or maybe had modified it).
But this isn't a ghost shift Louis Vuitton bag, it's literally exactly the same. Using Microsoft's trademark isn't misrepresenting the product.
“These sales of counterfeit operating systems,” Microsoft lawyer Bonnie MacNaughton wrote to the judge, “displaced Microsoft’s potential sales of genuine operating systems.” But Lundgren’s disks had no licenses and were intended for computers that already had licenses."