Re:China, India grapple with the consequences too many men
by rabboRubble on Tuesday April 24, 2018 @10:53PM
(#16918341)
I know. I find it intolerable to be lectured by the anti-abortion crowd who seem completely okay with the idea of US insurance plans not including pregnancy coverage automatically. Why should men be forced to pay for something they don't use they say. We will be fighting to keep the bare minimum we gained with the ACA and it will likely be a losing battle as with so many other things involving women's reproductive health.
Re:China, India grapple with the consequences too many men
by apta on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @03:27AM
(#16919259)
I'm neither republican or democrat, and I find the entire two party system quite bizarre to say the least. That being said, there is no reason to blindly follow either, one can be anti-abortion yet pro health care, education, and so on. Moving the goal posts so to say is not an argument.
Re:China, India grapple with the consequences too many men
by apta on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @03:25AM
(#16919248)
The vast majority of your post is a an association fallacy. Believe it or not, people can be anti-abortion generally, yet are interested in protected the welfare of children, and pro paying taxes for healthcare and education and housing, etc. Your post provided no argument whatsoever.
Re:China, India grapple with the consequences too many men
by Semirhage on Wednesday April 25, 2018 @10:52AM
(#16922011)
Maybe that’s because it wasn’t an argument, or framed as one? “I’ve noticed” and “people often” struck you as an exercise in formal logic? The only part that represented an argument was the assertion of your willful ignorance of human nature and history, which ironically you ignored.
These same people are often against paying a cent in taxes for healthcare, education, food, housing. Those same people don’t even seem to bemoan genocides in places like Rwanda or Sudan, or the Congo until long after they end. To me, it reeks of screwy priorities, and control.