https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/8
https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/5
https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/6
https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/22
https://gitlab.com/groups/gitlab-org/-/epics/156
https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/3969
Highlights are bulk subscriptions of issues, better subgroup support for labels and milestones, and expanded issue weight support.
The plans for starter are detailed on https://about.gitlab.com/direction/#starter right now the only issue management one is and API for boards https://gitlab.com/gitlab-org/gitlab-ee/issues/4266
Of course when you start paying for starter you gain the many features that are already in there: https://about.gitlab.com/pricing/self-hosted/feature-compari...
We are at the point where we wouldn't mind scaling up to the paid 'Starter' level of GitLab if it would mean being able to replace Jira as our issue tracker. One thing that worries me though, is how GitLab seems to focus all of the relevant developments in that area (epics, roadmaps, etc.) on their 'Supreme' level of paid plans, which is way beyond our means.
Is there a clear plan for the issue tracking side of things as far as the 'Core' and 'Starter' offerings are concerned?