Re:Why a house is a terrible investment (2013)
by wl78393 on Sunday April 22, 2018 @08:02PM
(#16899444)
"Don't worry millenials! You didn't really want a house anyway, it's a terrible idea! Keep paying those student loan payments and renting!" -- Retired boomer with $1MM+ equity in their suburban California home purchased in 1975 for $10k.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Why a house is a terrible investment (2013)
by 0x00000000 on Sunday April 22, 2018 @08:16PM
(#16899520)
*with 1975 property tax locked in thanks to prop 13
Re:Why a house is a terrible investment (2013)
by briandear on Sunday April 22, 2018 @08:19PM
(#16899540)
That is so true and one of the major reasons SV real estate is such a tight market. Those tax rate freezes essentially eliminate a good portion of liquidity normally present in a market.
Re:Why a house is a terrible investment (2013)
by Overtonwindow on Sunday April 22, 2018 @08:17PM
(#16899529)
Is that accurate? Property taxes can change
Re:Why a house is a terrible investment (2013)
by jurassic on Sunday April 22, 2018 @08:22PM
(#16899555)
Property taxes are locked to the purchase price of the home in California because of a law called Proposition 13. It's a been major contributor to the housing crisis but is extremely popular with everyone who currently owns property. It lets owners benefit from appreciation of their property without any increase in their tax liability while newer (and often younger) buyers must pay taxes based on the current absurd home prices.
Re:Why a house is a terrible investment (2013)
by wl78393 on Sunday April 22, 2018 @08:24PM
(#16899565)
Yes, with rare exceptions Prop 13 means you get your property tax assessment locked in when you purchase. The major way to trigger re-assessment is to pull a permit for construction/improvements, which is why unpermitted remodels/additions are so rampant in California.
Re:Why a house is a terrible investment (2013)
by Terr_ on Sunday April 22, 2018 @08:08PM
(#16899467)
To be fair, it's hard to say that trying to follow the exact same trajectory today would lead you to the exact same place in 2061.
Re:Why a house is a terrible investment (2013)
by DrScump on Sunday April 22, 2018 @09:11PM
(#16899779)
suburban California home purchased in 1975 for $10k
Where? About the cheapest you could do in San Jose then was $21K for a 1400sf condo from Singer Housing (the budget developer of the era). I grew up in one.
Re:Why a house is a terrible investment (2013)
by david-gpu on Sunday April 22, 2018 @08:07PM
(#16899459)
HN guidelines discourage these sort of shallow dismissive comments. Reading a constructive rebuttal would be more interesting.
Re:Why a house is a terrible investment (2013)
by mancerayder on Sunday April 22, 2018 @08:19PM
(#16899539)
While snarky, he made a point about material interest differences between two generations.
Re:Why a house is a terrible investment (2013)
by mixmastamyk on Sunday April 22, 2018 @08:07PM
(#16899462)
^Nimby boomer.