News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on A Feasible Approach to Human Stasis for Long-Duration Deep Space Missions. Parent comment

Re:A Feasible Approach to Human Stasis for Long-Duration Dee... by darawk on Sunday April 22, 2018 @03:23AM (#16895111)
So, poor people shouldn't have the option to do this, because if you give them the choice, someday a republican might make it a requirement of welfare? That seems like a bit of a silly argument.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A Feasible Approach to Human Stasis for Long-Duration Dee... by macintux on Sunday April 22, 2018 @07:43AM (#16895759)
Was the point of this discussion to discuss why people may be concerned about unintended consequences or to blithely assert omniscience? Maybe I just picked the wrong thread.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:A Feasible Approach to Human Stasis for Long-Duration Dee... by darawk on Sunday April 22, 2018 @12:59PM (#16897071)
If all you're saying is that people could theoretically be concerned about that, then sure I agree. I just think the concern is misplaced.
[ Parent | on HN ]