News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why programmers are not paid in proportion to their produ... by haihaibye on Friday April 20, 2018 @10:46PM (#16889741)
There were teams of 2-3 average programmers who, combined, didn't deliver what John Carmack did over his career.

What about in algorithm development or research? Could an average programmer invent quicksort, dynamic programming or information theory if transported back to the mid 20th century?

There is >10x productivity in scientists or mathematician using many kinds of metrics (papers, citations, awards etc)

Re:Why programmers are not paid in proportion to their produ... by StevenPaul on Saturday April 21, 2018 @03:59AM (#16890451)
"Could an average programmer invent quicksort, dynamic programming or information theory if transported back to the mid 20th century?"

I think many could have yes, had they been in the same academic environment as the people who invented those things. It's amazing what normal people can acheive when they are isolated from the noise of modern corporate work environments and given the resources to focus on a problem.

Re:Why programmers are not paid in proportion to their produ... by haihaibye on Saturday April 21, 2018 @10:24PM (#16894397)
Not only can most programmers not create it, most can't implement it:

Binary search is a great example because it's so simple and yet it's so easy to implement incorrectly. In Programming Pearly, Jon Bently shares how, over the years, he asked hundreds of programmers to implement binary search after providing them with a description of the basic algorithm. He gave them a very generous two hours to write it, and even allowed them to use the high-level language of their choice (including pseudocode). Surprisingly, only about 10 percent of professional programmers implemented binary search correctly. (Beautiful Code, p. 87)