News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:No “Material Difference Between 5G and LTE” by joezydeco on Friday April 20, 2018 @01:55PM (#16886945)
Comcast is the only broadband provider in my town that can deliver a service greater than 2 mbit/sec.

AT&T has U-Verse DSLAMS in some corners, but gave up on covering the entire town and the copper network is old and crumbling. There is zero hope of any kind of fiber service showing up.

In my personal experience Comcast's service isn't bad, but their rates are tied to the fact that there is no competition. My belief is that prices would drop about 50% and speeds would jump up 20% if another company could get into the space.

And that's just for IP service. Video service is another story altogether. TMO's purchase of Layer3 gives me some hope that maybe there will be a decent streaming service they will bundle with it.

Re:No “Material Difference Between 5G and LTE” by tatersolid on Friday April 20, 2018 @10:34PM (#16889712)
> In my personal experience Comcast's service isn't bad, but their rates are tied to the fact that there is no competition.

Yep. My town has exactly one provider: Comcast. They even negotiated a 50-year exclusive right of way back in the 80s by lining some local politician pockets.

I pay $250/month for internet, landline phone, and basic cable bundle.

This includes about $50 worth of bullshit “copper recovery fees” and the like which are designed to sound like taxes but are really just pure profit for Comcast.