News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Amazon worker’s median pay in 2017: $28,446 by nathanaldensr on Thursday April 19, 2018 @01:54PM (#16878232)
This is a great article for demonstrating how mean and median can be used to manipulate perception.
Re:Amazon worker’s median pay in 2017: $28,446 by jaysonelliot on Thursday April 19, 2018 @02:16PM (#16878488)
Median is the appropriate measure to use if you're looking at the overall pay of a company's workforce.

Average/mean is disproportionately influenced by a small number of highly paid employees.

In this case, the article is clearly demonstrating that despite Amazon's commanding market share, incredible wealth, and the largess bestowed upon their executives, some of their workforce is so poorly paid that they may not even make a living wage.

Re:Amazon worker’s median pay in 2017: $28,446 by goshx on Thursday April 19, 2018 @02:20PM (#16878540)
That median is not US only.
Re:Amazon worker’s median pay in 2017: $28,446 by baby on Friday April 20, 2018 @04:45AM (#16883183)
> Median is the appropriate measure to use if you're looking at the overall pay of a company's workforce.

I would disagree with that. Imagine this dataset of salaries:

[1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10]

You have around half employees being paid like shit (1) and half being paid well (10), but the median will show a good salary (10).

Re:Amazon worker’s median pay in 2017: $28,446 by WhompingWindows on Thursday April 19, 2018 @02:17PM (#16878508)
Yes, I agree. Mean is obviously going to be to the right of median in this income distribution, since there will be many employees making 200k+.

>In Seattle, Amazon’s more than 45,000 employees are paid an average of more than $110,000, according to an analysis of individual worker data posted to job review site Glassdoor. The median, or midpoint, of Amazon’s 566,000 individual employee salaries worldwide stood far lower.

Granted, we are using average data from Glassdoor, whereas Amazon is self-reporting the median salary information. Plus, Amazon has part-time workers whose wages it annualizes to include the dataset. This makes me wonder though, are they counting the benefits that those workers are not receiving due to their lower number of hours?

Re:Amazon worker’s median pay in 2017: $28,446 by nathanaldensr on Thursday April 19, 2018 @10:03PM (#16881625)
Replying to myself: I didn't mean to imply that the article or its contents are manipulative; I merely meant that it's a good example of how different numbers can be, and how that is often used to manipulate perception.
Re:Amazon worker’s median pay in 2017: $28,446 by fortythirteen on Thursday April 19, 2018 @02:24PM (#16878585)
Not to mention that this means the lower half of wage earners at Amazon make an average of $14 an hour, which isn't terrible for, what we can assume is, mostly unskilled labor.
Re:Amazon worker’s median pay in 2017: $28,446 by aje403 on Thursday April 19, 2018 @02:18PM (#16878518)
"Global Median"

Seattletimes.com

Don't they like Amazon out there or did the author fail an interview for Amazon or something?