Re:FCC Issues Warning in Wake of Swarm's Unauthorized Launch
by dswiese on Thursday April 19, 2018 @01:54PM
(#16878230)
Is anyone surprised a startup ignored the ruling of a regulatory body and did what they wanted anyways?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:FCC Issues Warning in Wake of Swarm's Unauthorized Launch
by reaperducer on Thursday April 19, 2018 @02:26PM
(#16878608)
But... but... but... being "disruptive" is a good thing!
Move fast and break [laws]. It's the SV way.
Re:FCC Issues Warning in Wake of Swarm's Unauthorized Launch
by stcredzero on Thursday April 19, 2018 @04:26PM
(#16879809)
Move Fast and Start a Kessler Syndrome Cascade?
Re:FCC Issues Warning in Wake of Swarm's Unauthorized Launch
by mfoy_ on Thursday April 19, 2018 @02:37PM
(#16878740)
"Move fast and break things" is a problematic motto if it applies equally to your product and work culture.
Re:FCC Issues Warning in Wake of Swarm's Unauthorized Launch
by chasing on Thursday April 19, 2018 @03:17PM
(#16879129)
And to the health and safety of those around you...
Re:FCC Issues Warning in Wake of Swarm's Unauthorized Launch
by PhasmaFelis on Thursday April 19, 2018 @10:13PM
(#16881661)
It's a problem if your product is anything that actually matters. (Which is why several medical start-ups have wound up neck deep in shit in the last few years.)
Re:FCC Issues Warning in Wake of Swarm's Unauthorized Launch
by ixtli on Thursday April 19, 2018 @04:32PM
(#16879859)
Move fast and break other people's safety.
Re:FCC Issues Warning in Wake of Swarm's Unauthorized Launch
by bigiain on Thursday April 19, 2018 @09:41PM
(#16881550)
"Uber, but for space trash!"
(A herd of 2nd tier VC's are now breaking FCC laws throwing money at orbital velocities vaguely in the direction of some random Starbucks in SOMA...)
Re:FCC Issues Warning in Wake of Swarm's Unauthorized Launch
by Bizarro on Thursday April 19, 2018 @11:29PM
(#16881962)
Challenging power that might or might not be legitimate or have jurisdiction is prudent and responsible.
Claiming random regulatory body has a "ruling" just because some guys typed something into a document isn't responsible.