Dataturks – ML data annotations and labeling doesn't need to suck

Re:Dataturks – ML data annotations and labeling doesn't need... by Eridrus on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @05:05PM (#16871185)

Why do so few of these systems have integration with something like Mechanical Turk? Labeling your own data is a good way to get started, but often its a much better to just pay some people to annotate the data.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dataturks – ML data annotations and labeling doesn't need... by mrgordon on Thursday April 19, 2018 @04:03AM (#16874146)

https://www.figure-eight.com/introducing-instance-based-pixe...

Yes Figure Eight (formerly CrowdFlower) does a ton of this kinda thing.

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wxi2dInWDnI

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Dataturks – ML data annotations and labeling doesn't need... by gajju3588 on Thursday April 19, 2018 @04:30AM (#16874259)

Hey, Thanks for checking us out, it makes a lot of sense to have integration with something like MTurk, so we are talking to some of such service providers, who provide expertise in kind of task we currently support. Very soon we will come with a good news in this area. :-)

[ Parent | on HN ]