Re:Probability Theory for Scientists and Engineers
by aje403 on Monday April 16, 2018 @09:44AM
(#16848899)
"There is a set called the power set that contains all the sets in a space"
I don't think he's the best expositor and some of his terminology is crappy, but I understood the author from what I've read so far. I literally have no idea what you're trying to say; this has no meaning
Re:Probability Theory for Scientists and Engineers
by nicbou on Wednesday April 18, 2018 @05:26AM
(#16865903)
There is a set. It's called the power set. It contains all the sets in a space.
Re:Probability Theory for Scientists and Engineers
by aje403 on Thursday April 19, 2018 @09:50AM
(#16875858)
The terms space and set are not synonymous. A space is defined on a set.
The collection of all subsets of a set X is called the power set and is typically denoted as P(X).
Replacing something confusing but loosely understandable with something even more confusing isn't an improving anything
Re:Probability Theory for Scientists and Engineers
by internetman55 on Monday April 16, 2018 @08:20AM
(#16848413)
Well your second statement isn't even logically equivalent to the first for one
I wish people could teach math in plain English. I don't know why the math and physics world refuses to write for the reader. I took this class before, and I still don't know what the author means by "less mathematically savory elements".
Here's you explain things to humans:
> There is a set called the power set that contains all the sets in a space. This set is huge, and it contains [less mathematically savory elements]. This is why we usually use a restricted version that removes the unwanted sets.
Seriously, there's no point to this sort of fancy language. Math is already hard. No need to make it harder.