News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:‘Moderate’ drinking guidelines are too loose, study says by kelnos on Monday April 16, 2018 @06:37AM (#16847975)
I don't mean to sound flippant or sarcastic, but I'm not sure I'd look to a psychiatrist to be an expert on the physical (not mental/emotional) effects of alcohol.

Beyond that, this paper does actually seem to shed some light on what is and is not safe. If 0-100 grams of alcohol per week only decreases your life expectancy by 6 months, I'd consider that pretty safe. I mean, I imagine getting behind the wheel of a car to drive to work every day reduces your life expectancy in a way that working from home every day doesn't. And yet people all over the place drive daily, and we consider that plenty safe enough. At least drinking alcohol is a lot more fun.

Absolutely agree with you on the idea that there seems to be a concerted effort in research to find a way, any way, to deem alcohol consumption safe or good for you in some ways.

Re:‘Moderate’ drinking guidelines are too loose, study says by palimpsests on Monday April 16, 2018 @09:27AM (#16848794)
> I'm not sure I'd look to a psychiatrist to be an expert on the physical (not mental/emotional) effects of alcohol.

Why not? Psychiatrists are MDs.

Re:‘Moderate’ drinking guidelines are too loose, study says by posterboy on Monday April 16, 2018 @08:05AM (#16848340)
> I imagine getting behind the wheel of a car to drive to work every day

strawman! you don't actually know and anyway, one is more or less essential, the other ... isn't?