Re:Origins of the myth of dopamine as the ‘pleasure chemical’
by psyc on Sunday April 15, 2018 @01:35PM
(#16843764)
My understanding of the consensus in quantum mechanics, is that the wave function evolves deterministically, but the state of the universe falls out of the wave function non-deterministically. So the probabilities evolve deterministically, but the empirical state of all the 'particles' doesn't. Second-order determinism, not first-order.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Determinism#Other_matters_of_q...
Huh? You're seem to be the one to suggest "probabilistic outcomes for normally deterministic chemical processes".
If personal choice is not an illusion/rationalization (as the parent suggests), then it's real.
By which means such a real agent would come into play in an otherwise deterministic universe?
Or are you saying the universe is not deterministic?