Re:Assumptions about how children learn to read have been di...
by acdha on Saturday April 14, 2018 @08:47PM
(#16840458)
Just to repeat the point, it’s about intentional versus unintentional usage. Nobody is saying that it’s wrong to test things like familiarity with a wide range of material, only that it’s important to only test the things you intend to test — i.e. what basic scientific principles would tell you to do in any similar situation. That doesn’t mean that you couldn’t e.g. publish a big reading list and say that the English test may include material by these authors since anyone could read that list; it’s just about keeping the competition fair by making sure anyone can learn all of what they should prepare for.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
There are no comments on this comment yet.