News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Ember.js 3.1 and 3.2 Beta Released by ravenstine on Saturday April 14, 2018 @02:34PM (#16838741)
I don't think Ember's bad rap is due to its marketing image. First off, Ember long had a reputation for being less performant out of all frontend frameworks. It was mostly true for some time, but Ember is pretty fast these days.

More importantly, I think that frontend development still is influenced by its long history of "duct tape" coding practices resulting from JavaScript and CSS being very crippled for much of their existence. Thus, many JavaScript developers seem to prefer simple libraries that can do a lot with a little investment in configuration and composition.

Of course there's also the fact that Tilde is the most notable supporter of Ember, whereas Angular has Google and React has Facebook.

But some people, such as myself, like an opinionated toolchain such as Ember.

Re:Ember.js 3.1 and 3.2 Beta Released by Kerrick on Saturday April 14, 2018 @03:16PM (#16838915)
I’d say that LinkedIn is a much more notable supporter of Ember than Tilde.
Re:Ember.js 3.1 and 3.2 Beta Released by lf-non on Saturday April 14, 2018 @04:04PM (#16839172)
Given that even after a major overhaul, Linkedin's web interface is sub-par wrt. UX as well as performance, I am not sure Linkedin's endorsement really contributes positively towards popularity of Ember.
Re:Ember.js 3.1 and 3.2 Beta Released by atonse on Saturday April 14, 2018 @09:05PM (#16840516)
Totally agree. I love ember but linked in’s new ember interface just makes my Laptop fans spin like crazy.

I worry because I know they’ve hired some of the most talented folks from the Ember community (people who care about performance and scrolling jankyness). This is not a knock on them, but it is worrying that even the best of the best may struggle with larger, more complex apps.