News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Assumptions about how children learn to read have been di... by ghaff on Saturday April 14, 2018 @12:38PM (#16838074)
There's something to be said for learning the "canon" but high school English only does that in a very superficial way under the best of circumstances. There are fairly classic books--at least some of which are admittedly more recent than ye olde public domain--which are pretty readable today. But IMO Henry James, Bronte sisters, Tolstoy, etc. are going to be a pretty tough slog for most modern readers, especially at high school age.
Re:Assumptions about how children learn to read have been di... by skookumchuck on Saturday April 14, 2018 @03:43PM (#16839061)
They're boring, too. Why not read Tolkien instead? Or Asimov? or Clancy?
Re:Assumptions about how children learn to read have been di... by walshemj on Saturday April 14, 2018 @01:28PM (#16838320)
Not at say 17 or 18 though