Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by jobigoud on Saturday April 14, 2018 @02:38AM
(#16836207)
I think he means 7H of interviews in total in order to find the right candidate for the position.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by tomkarlo on Monday April 16, 2018 @02:04PM
(#16851237)
Lol, no. It's higher than that because 70% of screener interviews end up not resulting in a hire, and probably 50-70% of on-sites don't. I think the last estimate I saw was about 50 hrs of interviewing total per hired candidate, and that feels about right to me.
7 interviews just for the hired candidate (1-2 screeners, 5-6 on-site pool interviews.) Maybe less than 7 hrs if they're cut to 45 mins each.
Re:Google loses ‘right to be forgotten’ case
by jimmywanger on Saturday April 14, 2018 @12:22PM
(#16837999)
In that case, it's not an amortized cost of the time it takes to interview each person that comes in the door.