Re:The State Pension Funding Gap
by kazagistar on Friday April 13, 2018 @10:40AM
(#16830382)
If you propagate debts far enough, you are effectively trasferring wealth from not-yet voters to existing voters. In other words, taking from those who don't have a political voice yet.
Re:The State Pension Funding Gap
by toomuchtodo on Friday April 13, 2018 @01:17PM
(#16831956)
But there is reason to do this. Not-yet voters inherit society and it’s infrastructure. There is value in what they’re inheriting.
We’re just arguing about the amount of the transfer at this point.
Also known as Corbynomics
Re:The State Pension Funding Gap
by crdoconnor on Friday April 13, 2018 @11:28AM
(#16830888)
All the more reason to tax unearned income at a higher rate, no?
Wall St (well most of it) would not want to strip people of their pensions. There is too much money in managing the assets in those pensions and they would I am sure advocate for federal money to make up for the shortfall.
More likely it was added because they knew that there would eventually be a concerted political effort to strip them of their pensions )and raid those pensions) by a combination of business lobbies and wall street.
>I also don't think quadrupling taxes on the next generation is morally any better either.
What is your moral objection to taxing unearned income at a higher rate?