Goldman Sachs questions whether curing patients is a sustainable business model

Re:Goldman Sachs questions whether curing patients is a sust... by sametmax on Friday April 13, 2018 @09:32AM (#16829782)

You'd be surprise how much common sense people pay to hear in some different form and name. Yin/yang, ayurveda, etc. We love creating symbolism for things grandma said to their children for 1000 years.

Beside, most reason to go to the doctor go away if you have a healthy life style.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Goldman Sachs questions whether curing patients is a sust... by logfromblammo on Friday April 13, 2018 @11:42AM (#16831057)

Everything developed before science is suspected to be bunk.

Everything developed after science is suspected to be bunk until the experiment has been replicated.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Goldman Sachs questions whether curing patients is a sust... by sametmax on Friday April 13, 2018 @12:14PM (#16831378)

I think nobody suspected getting enough sleep was bunk before we did a study on 1000 people.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Goldman Sachs questions whether curing patients is a sust... by logfromblammo on Friday April 13, 2018 @01:54PM (#16832294)

1000 years of grandmas passing down oral history is a great source of experiment ideas, but the one about only hiring/funding people that can publish a positive result in a high-impact journal needs to get tested ASAP.

Getting rid of the useless cruft lingering around from the past is just as useful as advancing the frontiers of knowledge.

When people can stop waving crystals around and dipping their fingers in oil, they can finally get better results from pushing the big green button on an inscrutably opaque black box that goes "ding".~

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Goldman Sachs questions whether curing patients is a sust... by sametmax on Saturday April 14, 2018 @08:10AM (#16836985)

Yes but that's not incompatible. Life is not an all of nothing proposal.

[ Parent | on HN ]