News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Background checks pay for Checkr, which just raised $100M by optimiz3 on Thursday April 12, 2018 @06:50PM (#16825671)
Why should someone have to pay for their report to clear allegations against them?
Re:Background checks pay for Checkr, which just raised $100M by jeffmould on Thursday April 12, 2018 @08:04PM (#16826033)
It is not necessarily about paying to "clear allegations" against them, it is about adding context to convictions/arrests listed their background report.

For example, someone may add this to a drug conviction listed on their report: "I was 18, a freshman in college, and away from home for the first time. I was at a party where drugs were consumed and I was subsequently arrested for possession. Since that time I have obtained my college degree and maintained an active, drug free, lifestyle. I learned my lesson, changed my life and drugs are no longer a part of my lifestyle."

If the receive a copy of their report due to an adverse action by an employer there is no charge to add the statement. I do agree, however, that, like a credit report, background reports should be free to obtain at least once a year. There are countless cases of mistaken identity and incorrect information on criminal background reports that are often found out after it is too late. Often times too, many arrests/convictions can be removed from your report depending on the type, state, and age of arrest/conviction. Many college students don't realize the long-term repercussions of simple indiscretions. It is only after they apply for a job and are turned down because of a background check that they realize the beer they were caught drinking at age 20 in their college dorm room had bigger consequences than the $50 fine.

Re:Background checks pay for Checkr, which just raised $100M by iamdave on Thursday April 12, 2018 @11:43PM (#16826991)
You already do if you plan to expunge or seal records with the court system. Not to excuse it but to highlight the precedent.