Re:A school-based obesity prevention programme was ineffective
by maxerickson on Thursday April 12, 2018 @09:18AM
(#16820572)
Doesn't the federal school lunch program mostly just provide funding for low income students?
I think a requirement to eat the school provided meal would probably be local stupidity.
Re:A school-based obesity prevention programme was ineffective
by JoeAltmaier on Thursday April 12, 2018 @09:52AM
(#16820882)
Rural community. Not a lot of resources or facilities. No place to put a lunch from home (no refrigeration/storage). Not stupid, practical.
The school lunch program feeds anybody who shows up. Nothing to do with income.
Re:A school-based obesity prevention programme was ineffective
by maxerickson on Thursday April 12, 2018 @10:11AM
(#16821067)
The federal school lunch program is predicated on income. That's basically all it is, a system for providing funds to schools with low income students.
It comes with things like minimum standards for the meals, but I don't think it comes with a limit on how much food each student can be served.
Re:A school-based obesity prevention programme was ineffective
by JoeAltmaier on Thursday April 12, 2018 @10:22AM
(#16821185)
Every school in Iowa has a lunch program, even the wealthiest. Its subsidized of course, but for everybody. True low income can get you a waiver, like many other government programs, but the lunch is available to all.
There is absolutely a limit on food.
This program was phenomenally clueless and ill-conceived. Instead of patronizing inappropriate low-calorie choices (which drove students to hoarding dingdongs in their lockers), how about providing plentiful good food? That might have had a positive effect.
{edit: I thought they were talking about the federal school-lunch initiative, sorry}