News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fuchsia is not Linux by dingo_bat on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @08:55PM (#16817166)
> Just self-proclaimed authority who decided systems means operating system or some embedded code

Systems does mean that. There are 2 broad categories of software you can write. One is software that provides a service to the user directly. That is an application. The other kind is software that provides a service to applications. That's systems software. Do you think there's something wrong with this notion? It's pretty well accepted over the decades:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_programming

Re:Fuchsia is not Linux by geodel on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @10:58PM (#16817639)
Well by that definition Docker, Kubernetes, etcd and so on are systems software. But people here somehow explicitly make it to mean Computer Operating Systems.
Re:Fuchsia is not Linux by slrz on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @10:50PM (#16817608)
Sure, and Go's most prolific users are in infrastructure software for distributed systems. You seem to agree with the quoted statement.
Re:Fuchsia is not Linux by weberc2 on Thursday April 12, 2018 @09:58AM (#16820950)
By this definition, Python and JavaScript are systems languages.