News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Fuchsia is not Linux by dfox on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @05:31PM (#16815906)
In my experience the second time leads to architecture astronautics... third time is when you get it right.

Althought in OS space one might argue that second generation of time sharing OSes (TOPS-10, ITS, MCP...) got more things right than are right in Unix and such.

Re:Fuchsia is not Linux by kps on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @09:53PM (#16817395)
Perhaps I'm subject to a giant whoosh here, but this subthread is recapitulating The Mythical Man-Month piece by piece.
Re:Fuchsia is not Linux by zaarn on Thursday April 12, 2018 @02:48AM (#16818561)
Reinventing well explored areas of software engineering from first principles!
Re:Fuchsia is not Linux by tandr on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @06:43PM (#16816417)
I like the term "architecture astronautics". There is probably a joke hiding somewhere in a plain sight about "Plan 9" wrt Unix...
Re:Fuchsia is not Linux by dfox on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @07:42PM (#16816814)
For OS it means that you should pick one abstraction for process state and one abstraction for IO and in fact you can have same abstraction for both. In this view Plan 9 makes sense while modern Unix with files, sockets, AIO, signals, various pthread and IPC primitives and so on does not (not to mention the fact that on every practical POSIX implementation various such mechanisms are emulated in terms of other synchronisation mechanisms)