Why SQLite Does Not Use Git

Re:Why SQLite Does Not Use Git by irrational on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @10:33PM (#16807592)

The number 1 reason my team has not moved from Subversion to Git is we can't decide what branching model to use. Use flow, don't use flow, use this model, use that model, no, only a moron would use that model, use this one instead. Rebase, don't rebase, etc. No doubt people will say that it all depends on the project/team/environment/etc., but nobody ever says "If your project/team/environment/etc. look like this, then use this model." So we keep on using Subversion and figure that someday we will run across information that convinces us that it is the one true branching model.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why SQLite Does Not Use Git by naasking on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @11:33PM (#16807825)

I have another solution: just switch to mercurial. I switched some big projects to mercurial from svn many years ago. Migration was painless, tooling was similar but better, the interface is simpler than git, and haven't regretted it once.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why SQLite Does Not Use Git by prepend on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @08:38AM (#16810461)

This is the path I took for a few projects years ago when Google Code didn’t support git.

Switched to mercurial from svn and workflow was painless for the team. Interestingly, we slowly started adopting more distributed techniques like developer merges being common. With svn, I think I was the only one who could merge and it would be rare and added product risk.

Then after about a year of mercurial we switched to git and our brains had adapted. Our team was small, 5-10 people.

Somewhat relatedly, in 2002, I worked in a large team of 75 people or so with a large codebase of a few hundred thousand lines of active dev. It used Rational ClearCase had “big merges” that happened once or twice a release with thousands of files requiring reconciliation. There was a team who did this so it was annoying to dev in, but largely I didn’t care.

Company went through layoffs and the team was down to one. He quit, the company couldn’t merge, so couldn’t release new software versions.

There was a big crisis so they went to the architects and pulled a few out of dev work. It turns out I was the one who could figure it out and dumb enough to admit it.

That sucked. It took a few weeks to sort out and modify our dev process to make merges easy and common. But it was not fun. Upside is we ended up not having any “non-programmer” op/configuration management people since the layed off/quit team were ClearCase users, who didn’t code.

Moral- don’t let people know you can do hard, mundane tasks.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why SQLite Does Not Use Git by buvanshak on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @12:00AM (#16807923)

I have converted all my mercurial repos to git and I have forgotten all mercurial now. It helps me feel less pain when I am forced to work in Git....

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why SQLite Does Not Use Git by healsdata on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @12:13AM (#16807977)

> but nobody ever says "If your project/team/environment/etc. look like this, then use this model."

Honestly, its because a lot of it comes down to preference and what value you gain from using version control. It is very much like code style standards -- it doesn't matter what is in the standard so much as your teammates all using the same one.

If part of the blocker for your team is that no one is experienced enough with git to have a strong opinion, I'd be happy to brainstorm with you for an hour to learn about your current process and offer a tailored opinion.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why SQLite Does Not Use Git by whatshisface on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @11:04PM (#16807713)

Why not replicate whatever you are doing in Subversion in Git? You'll still be able to take advantage of the better merging algorithms, while maintaining whatever political momentum seems to be driving the team's decisions.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why SQLite Does Not Use Git by MsMowz on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @10:52PM (#16807664)

It really, really doesn't matter. That's one great thing about a distributed SCM.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why SQLite Does Not Use Git by petre on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @12:59AM (#16808178)

We moved from SVN to Fossil and it has worked out great for us. The other option was Mercurial but it required Python.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Why SQLite Does Not Use Git by sopooneo on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @05:11PM (#16815700)

If it is import to switch to Git, I suggest a technical leader, imbued with authority from management, make those decisions and just do it. However, I don't necessarily think a team should switch away from Subversion if it's working for them.

[ Parent | on HN ]