News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress by manigandham on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @07:17PM (#16806535)
> Zuckerberg on record (in the Congressional Record, no less) as saying that his business model depends on advertising

This has never been secret and has been "on record" for a very long time. I think most people will see the absolutely dismal lack of technical understanding by Congress rather than any arrogance by Facebook as they too get fed up with these aimless questions.

Re:Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress by jeffdavis on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @12:36AM (#16808069)
Have you ever written an introduction to a technical document before? You make statements in there that are obvious, not because the reader doesn't understand, but because you want to bring the reader into the right frame of mind with the right set of facts before them as context for the rest of the document.

Questions like this are really just asking Zuckerberg to introduce his business in a controlled way.

Re:Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress by manigandham on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @02:00AM (#16808425)
Alright that's fair, I guess I misinterpreted the original comment as if this was cleverly teasing the information out of him vs just repeating the fact as background for the hearing.
Re:Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress by rdtsc on Wednesday April 11, 2018 @12:59AM (#16808174)
> This has never been secret and has been "on record" for a very long time.

Been a secret to "whom"? Not secret to technical people, no. There are plenty of non-technical people who still don't understand the "you are the product not a customer" trope. They see this free "talk to your family" service which sometimes shows ads which they ignore. They might answer the "how FB makes money question?" with "I don't know, maybe some people pay for it. Or maybe they are just nice and give it away for free".

Other questions might have been stupid but that particular one was typical of how a police investigator might start questioning or how a lawyer might cross examine a witness.

> I think most people will see the absolutely dismal lack of technical understanding by Congress

Back in the day I used to think of lawyers asking witness questions on the stand the same way: "Why do you ask him if he knows the victim, of course he does, these lawyers are sure not very bright..."

Re:Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress by EpicEng on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @09:09PM (#16807223)
>I think most people will see the absolutely dismal lack of technical understanding by Congress

You really think most people have more technical understanding than these senators?

Re:Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress by manigandham on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @09:45PM (#16807370)
That's not necessary to realize that these senators do not.

Also yes, based on their questions and age, I do think most people have a better understanding. Just the expressions of the other audience members and staff in the room shows the frustration.

Re:Mark Zuckerberg testifies before Congress by EpicEng on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @10:19PM (#16807535)
I doubt the hearing audience represents the general population, and I have yet to meet anyone not involved in software development who understands anything about how it works outside of niche, semi-related circles.