Re:Who caused the Bay Area’s housing shortage?
by jjav on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @01:29PM
(#16803197)
The tax is not based on the current value nor on the value 30 years ago. It is based on a value which goes up 2% every year. The taxes go up every year but in a predictable way, it is damping function on the wild swings of the bubble/crash/repeat housing market.
So it is very easy to see how prop 13 was passed. The real estate tax is one the major yearly budget items for most families. Having it vary wildly and unpredictably year to year is not something most families [who don't earn tech bubble salaries] can handle.
Re:Who caused the Bay Area’s housing shortage?
by jon_richards on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @09:17AM
(#16801092)
The idea that people would get kicked out of their family homes due to increasing taxes without increasing someone's ability to pay them. Not to mention people on fixed income. Then add the fact that most people who voted already had their California home and were just voting for a tax cut for themselves.
What's the alternative? Maybe the discounted tax could be collected when the house is sold? Put in a limit where the total backlog of tax is capped by the amount the house has appreciated in value to avoid making selling the house impossible.
If you own something that's taxable (like property in CA), shouldn't you have to pay tax on the value of the damn thing?
If you're paying tax on the value of your house/land, it only makes sense to pay a tax based on the current value, not the one 30 years ago. Typically your house/land is going to go UP in value, and so do your taxes.