The Encryption Debate Isn't About Stopping Terrorists, It's About Solving Crime

Re:The Encryption Debate Isn't About Stopping Terrorists, It... by LoSboccacc on Monday April 09, 2018 @04:09PM (#16796523)

Even assuming this is possible, which it isn’t, whose government would hold whose keys? It’s not like there’s one government and there isn’t international crime

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Encryption Debate Isn't About Stopping Terrorists, It... by vbezhenar on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @03:39AM (#16799730)

US for US companies, China for Chinese companies. May be some kind of union.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Encryption Debate Isn't About Stopping Terrorists, It... by LoSboccacc on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @12:15PM (#16802466)

So what happens when a chinese company hack into an american company, steal some industrial secrets and save them on their encrypted servers?

This isn’t some hypothetical scenario either http://time.com/106319/heres-what-chinese-hackers-actually-s...

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The Encryption Debate Isn't About Stopping Terrorists, It... by cesarb on Tuesday April 10, 2018 @08:29AM (#16800810)

What about multinationals? What about subsidiaries, like a Brazilian company which is fully owned by a USA company? Who would get the key, Brazil or the USA?

[ Parent | on HN ]