Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric...
by interfixus on Saturday April 07, 2018 @04:26PM
(#16782724)
I see I'm getting hammered for my negativity, but I certainly meant it when I said in awe about the first part. It's magnificent, never mind the lunar gravity problem, which I've never seen well done on film.
It's only a couple of months since I last tried - and gave up on - watching 2001 to the end. Probably my own shortcoming entirely - I see nothing but pretentious late sixties posing from the stargate and onwards.
Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric...
by mcguire on Saturday April 07, 2018 @08:11PM
(#16783802)
I don't know. Looking at the mental landscape of a transhuman, pretentious late-sixties posing is probably the best you can hope for.
Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric...
by itronitron on Saturday April 07, 2018 @11:42PM
(#16784489)
I tried to watch 2001 again about 8 years ago and had to put it on fast forward, at 10X speed, and even then I was still falling asleep through most of it
Re:“Close to tears, he left at the intermission”: how Kubric...
by colordrops on Monday April 09, 2018 @03:17AM
(#16791042)
If you had it at 10x you weren't really watching it.
Something I've noticed about '2001' in the meanwhile is that its aesthetics seem very future-proof. It doesn't seem dated or plastic-y like other stuff from that era.
An interesting article about the setting and social environment: 'HAL, Mother, and Father: Watching the sixties and seventies through 2001 and Alien.' https://www.theparisreview.org/blog/2015/01/09/hal-mother-an...